Racism. No way Classroom
Classroom Games Room Library Strategies News


Classroom
Fact sheets
Focus on the media
Lesson ideas
Spotlight
Webquests
print icon Print friendly version

Fact Sheets

View latest | View all

Native Title Act 1993

The 1992 Mabo decision dealt only with the rights of the native title-holders of Murray Island and could not resolve all the questions raised by the broader application of native title in the rest of Australia. The Native Title Act 1993 (NTA) responded to the need to resolve some of these questions and to create a framework for the recognition of native title.

The NTA endorsed the principle of native title established in the Mabo decision. The Act also validated past acts of government granting interests in land that extinguished native title. It established that native title holders whose native title was thus validly extinguished after the enactment of the Racial Discrimination Act in 1975 were entitled to compensation. The NTA created a procedure for the determination of native title claims, including the establishment of the National Native Title Tribunal (NNTT). The NNTT mediates native title claims, and if the mediation is not successful, claims may be decided by the Federal Court.

The NTA came into operation on 1 January 1994. In July 1998 amendments were made to the Act that wound back the rights of native title holders significantly. These amendments override much of the existing protection for native title holders under the Racial Discrimination Act, and cannot be challenged on grounds of inconsistency with this Act. The original NNTT provided a framework for future dealings affecting native title. Native title claimants were given the procedural 'right to negotiate' over future uses of land potentially subject to native title. Some of the changes involve: weakening the right to negotiate; confirming and validating the extinguishment of native title on a range of leases; limiting native title holders' access to pastoral leases; and increasing the difficulty of registration of native title claims.

One of the more positive amendments involved the capacity to make 'Indigenous land use agreements' (ILUAs) as an alternative to settling claims through formal determination procedures.

The United Nations International Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD) has found that some of the amendments to the Native Title Act are discriminatory as they prefer the rights of non-Indigenous title holders.

Source:

Face the Facts, Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission, Sydney, 2001

Refer also:
Racism. No way! fact sheets:Terra Nullius and
Mabo and Wik
Australian and international law
National Native Title Tribunal, Native Title Facts
Northern Land Council
HREOC The RDA and native title

Theme:

Aboriginal people and Torres Strait Islanders - Australian history and race relations


  Last Modified: 19 Jan 2006 Home |  About Us |  Links |  Help |  Feedback |  Disclaimer  

© Conference of Education Systems Chief Executive Officers 2000
This page: /classroom/factsheets/20.html/

NSW Department of Education and Training

Racism, No way! is an Australian anti-racism education initiative managed by the Department of Education and Training on behalf of education systems nationally.

Need help? Prejudice No Way!
Racism, No Way! is proudly designed and programmed by Social Change Online.
kids helpline 1800 55 1800