Pages Menu
Categories Menu

The rhetoric of hate speech

How we relate to each other and how we represent, label and portray others is important. The use of ‘othering’ language reinforces divisions and acrimony between groups by asserting irreconcilable differences between in-groups and out-groups. In contrast, language that emphasises our common humanity and interests reinforces social cohesion and a sense of shared concerns and universal rights.

Some of the main forms of hate speech are vilification, dehumanisation, demonisation, incitement, toxic misinformation, stereotyping and genocide denial.

Hate speech can be expressed in explicitly inflammatory and violent terms using words such as kill or hate but also may be free of explicitly hateful words while still functioning to distance or isolate others.

It is important to remember that target groups may be on the receiving end of hate speech every day. This video produced by the Stop Funding Hate campaign examines how it feels to be the target of relentless hate speech.

Racial and religious vilification

Vilification is behaviour or speech acts that incite hatred, serious contempt or severe ridicule of a person or group of people because of their race or religion. Vilification is against the law.

Find out more

Behaviour that could be seen as vilification includes:

  • speaking about a person’s race or religion in a way that could make other people hate or ridicule them.
  • publishing claims that a racial or religious group is involved in serious crimes without any proof.
  • repeated and serious spoken or physical abuse about the race or religion of another person.
  • encouraging violence against people who belong to a particular race or religion, or damaging their property.
  • encouraging people to hate a racial or religious group using flyers, stickers, posters, a speech or publication, or using websites or email.

It is also against the law to give permission or help someone to vilify others.

Racial Vilification Law in Australia outlines how racial hatred is defined under the Racial Discrimination Act 1975 and provides an overview of the complaints process of the Human Rights Commission. Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (HREOC). It also briefly outlines relevant state and territory provisions on racial vilification, including criminal sanctions.

Dehumanisation

Dehumanisation
Any act or idea that treats some people as less than human is an act of dehumanisation. Dehumanising metaphors play a crucial role in racist propaganda by identifying different groups of people as less or other than human.

This video produced by the organisation Faith matters looks at dehumanising language and how it impacts on communities.

Metaphors are powerful because they are able to create new links in our minds whereby the qualities of one thing or action become connected to another.

Find out more

A metaphor can completely alter what we perceive, how we think and what we feel and do. The metaphors prevalent in racist discourse often attach non-human qualities, attributes and behaviours to people while at the same time negating their humanity.

Dehumanising metaphors equate humans with:

  • Animals or insects – swarms of insects, simians, vermin, rabbits, termites
  • Objects or machines – robots, aliens, objects, vegetables
  • Natural phenomena – human tide, tsunami of immigrants
  • Diseases – plague, infection, cancer, parasites, virus

The denial of humanity of the targets of hate speech, robs them of their right The denial of humanity of the targets of hate speech, robs them of their right to compassion and other moral responses, and the target may suffer violence as a result. Dehumanising metaphors evoke hostility, disdain, loathing, physical disgust, and even bodily fear in people.

Demonisation

Demononisation

Demonisation is presenting a target group in overwhelmingly negative terms – characterising them as inherently malicious, immoral, ungodly, evil, dishonest or dangerous. Terms like bogus, fake, cheats, disruption, queue jumpers, gangs, thugs, illegals and other terms that imply moral inferiority, toxicity, danger or criminality.

Incitement

Incitement can be when language or rhetoric is used to incite others to commit acts of violence, intimidation, hostility or discrimination. Incitement can extend to include provocation to terrorism and atrocity crimes.

Aggressive nationalistic and xenophobic statements for example could incite hatred and discrimination against immigrants.

Toxic misinformation

Toxic misinformation is the dissemination of disinformation, false stories and news, linking the target group to violent, criminal or morally corrupt behaviour.

This includes unbalanced, sensationalist and untrue reporting in relation to Aboriginal people, ethnic minorities, immigrants and/or asylum seekers. For example misinformation in flyers circulated during the 2019 Australian Federal election malign Senator Anne Aly by drawing on race-based hatred and fear.

Negative stereotyping

Negative stereotyping is when all members of a group are viewed as sharing the same negative characteristics. When we stereotype people based on race, we don’t take into account individual differences. Racial stereotypes are reproduced in traditional media and in a range of new media including social media, music videos and games.
Kudzai Chirunga in his rap song 4 Deep In The Suburbs looks at the impacts of negative stereotypes on young African Australians.

Genocide denial

Genocide denial is the denial and or minimisation of the scale and severity of an incidence of genocide and can be seen as the final stage of a genocidal process.

By denying the collective memories of the victim group, its history is erased and the cuplbabilty of the perpetrators goes unacknowledged.

Similarly, truth telling is an important step in the process of reconciliation.
In Australia the lack of a shared understanding of history is a source of ongoing trauma for many first Australians and a barrier to reconciliation.

Find out more

Dr Richard Hovanissian says of the Armenian Genocide, “Following the physical destruction of a people and their material culture, memory is all that is left and is targeted as the last victim”.

Collective memory and reflection on the past are a vital part of group identity and group aspirations. Reckoning with the past helps us to define both who we are and what we want to be. When we deny or reject aspects of history we jeopardise our capacity to protect our values and the individual rights of citizens. The distortion of history robs us of the ability to learn from the past and undermines shared knowledge.

Politicians, thought leaders and the media have an important role to play in shaping the narrative and the way ‘others’ are perceived.